Hey friends, it’s Jorian—welcome to Into the Ring. I’m a startup fundraising coach for top founders and have worked with 60+ founders who’ve raised over $270M. (Want to work with me? Check out more details at jorianhoover.com.)
I just got back from a week in Hawaii and if anyone knows of founders hiring there, let me know and I’ll apply right away 🙂 — has anyone else thought “why can’t I just live here?” when you visit Hawaii?
Okay, on a serious note I’m feeling refreshed and excited to be back in the swing of startup fundraising. September is one of the busiest months when it comes to VC activity, and I can feel it first-hand from the number of founders who are fundraising and DMs from VCs.
In today’s newsletter, I’ll give a 1min take on taking money from family & friends, share the past two week’s Tier 1 VC deals, give my recommended VC essays & podcasts, and pen a deep dive on the all-important VC list.
As always, thank you for being part of this Into the Ring tribe of 2,000+ startup founders and operators/investors from OpenAI, Anthropic, a16z, Lightspeed, etc. If you think someone else might like this newsletter, they can sign up here.
Now onto today’s newsletter!
In today’s issue:
Jorian’s 1min take: taking money from family & friends
Tier 1 funding rounds: what rounds did top VCs lead the past two weeks? (August 22 - September 4, 2026)
VC essays & podcasts: my recommendations for the week
Today’s deep dive on how to fundraise like a pro: creating a robust VC list
1. Jorian’s 1min take: taking money from family & friends
Friends & family can be an important source of angel capital for your startup. And what better group to invest in you than those who most believe in you and who want to see the upside alongside you.
But buyer beware.
I often come across later-stage or multi-time founders who have strained relationships with friends & family who invested in them. At the root of many of these issues was a misunderstanding of what investing in the startup would mean.
The friends & family were expecting a relatively sure-fire bet of a decent return, and instead they got a ticket to board a rocketship and barely heard from the founder in the two years since they purchased the ticket.
If you are going to take money from friends & family, I recommend two things:
make clear to them that they are buying a ticket for a rocketship that will likely not work out. Nipping this in the bud often solves many issues around misunderstanding.
keep your friends & family updated on a monthly or quarterly basis after they make their investment. People will often forgive an investment not working out, but it’s harder to do so if they were left in the dark.
Do these two things and you’ll have a much better experience taking investment from friends & family.
2. What funding rounds did Tier 1 VCs (a16z, Sequoia, USV, etc.) lead the past two weeks? (August 22 - September 4, 2026)
[AI x biocomputing] General Catalyst: led a $10M Pre-Seed round into Frontier Computing (CTech - link)
[AI x enterprise software] General Catalyst & Kaszek: co-led a $12M Seed round into Primero AI (MarketScreener - link)
[AI x national security] Khosla Ventures & XYZ Venture Capital: co-led a $20.8M Seed round into Aslan Protects (Axios - link)
[AI x IT] S32 & Sequoia Capital: co-led a $21M Seed round into Empirik.ai (TechCrunch - link)
[AI x inference] Andreessen Horowitz (a16z): led a $300M Series B into Gimlet Labs (GlobeNewswire - link)
[AI x cybersecurity] Bessemer Venture Partners & TCV: co-led a $300M Series C into Upwind Security (SiliconANGLE - link)
3. This week’s recommended VC essays & podcast episodes
Newsletter: “The new Series A is the old Series B.” (link) by Patrick Salyer, Partner at Mayfield. Round names have gotten quite fuzzy in recent years, where Seeds now look a lot like Series As, and Series As like Series Bs. Salyer argues that founders should just raise the right amount rather than focusing on the round name. I agree.
Newsletter: “The Series A is dead, Long live the Series A” (link) by Jackie DiMonte, General Partner at Grid Capital. A nice complement to Salyer’s piece, DiMonete shares that because the Series A round size has increased dramatically, there are fewer funds who can lead those rounds — and founders feel like they’re getting passed on more often.
Newsletter: “AI gutting what you love about work? Me too.” (link) by Phin Barnes, Co-founder of The General Partnership. This piece hit home for me, especially “Ironically, the more accomplished you are, the more you fall prey to grindslop” … over the past few months, I’ve been getting more AI-native, but I’ve also noticed I’m enjoying certain work less as a result. Anyone else trying to find the right balance?
Newsletter: “The Incumbents Are Coming” (link) by Seema Amble, Partner at a16z. Amble argues that the system-of-record incumbents (a la Salesforce) will actually get further entrenched through AI, but that there’s still a vertical AI opportunity for startups.
Podcast: “Uncapped #56 | Brian Singerman from GPx” (link) on the Uncapped podcast with Jack Altman, with guest Brian Singerman, co-founder of GPx. Singerman had an illustrious career at Founders Fund and I think you’ll really enjoy his take on how they pick founders (hint: no rubric) and what their edge is. He also gives his spicy take on why he believes SPVs are dead.
4. Today's Deep Dive on How to Fundraise Like a Pro: creating a robust VC list
Creating a list of 100+ VCs is one of the most important things you can do for your fundraise.
But most founders screw this up.
I was catching up with a Series A founder who told me their Seed fundraise took 6 months. Whereas their Series A process only took 3 months.
One of the primary contributing factors was they lacked a robust VC list in their Seed fundraise — but for their Series A, they were working off of a well-oiled investor list.
Issue #1: A small VC list puts you on the backfoot
The first issue I see is having too small of a VC list. Let’s say the average fundraise requires 50 to 100 conversations with VCs. In that case, you’ll almost certainly need a list of 100+ VCs you’re working off of.
Instead, many founders have a VC list of only 20-50 VCs. The problem is that not all of these intros convert and so there’s not enough volume of VC conversations to really drive towards a term sheet.
What ends up happening is the founder often strikes out with a couple dozen VCs, and then needs to keep adding onesies and twosies until they get more VC conversations. And this can take months, as opposed to working off of a larger VC list in one fell swoop.
Issue #2: A list of non-lead VCs is almost useless
Another problem is founders will have a long VC list, but when you look under the hood, it’s primarily VCs who don’t lead rounds. And so there might be 80 or so VCs on the list, but only 20 can lead.
Well, while this founder might have a lot of VC conversations from this list, pretty much every VC will say “come back to us when you have a lead” and the founder leaves with still no investment.
Issue #3: Using someone else’s list leaves gaps
It can also be tempting to use someone else’s VC list and copy it as your own. While there are no plagiarism rules with this, the problem is that their VC list was applicable to their tastes, startup, and the time when they created the list.
If you’re using a list you received from someone else, it’s a bit like using a rental car to drive an F1 race. While it might get you to the final destination, it’s not going to be tuned or have the engine for your liking.
The solution: use the tentacle approach to create your VC list
So what do I recommend? Using what I call the tentacle approach to create your VC list. What I mean by tentacle is having lots of different tentacles to build out your VC list.
Typically where I see the building of VC lists go wrong is a founder will rely too much on just one source. Whether it’s Crunchbase, Claude, or Google, putting all your eggs into one basket with creating your VC list is a great way to miss tons of VCs who could be a good fit for you.
For your tentacles, here are some of my favorite recommendations I give to founders:
Google
Claude/ChatGPT
Other founders’ lists and recommendations
List you find floating around online
Then what you do is go to as many of these sources as you want, and then pull in as many lead VCs that may be relevant to you. Once you have a big list, you can then research that further by going to each VC’s website to ensure fit (this step will often remove many VCs).
Once you use this tentacle approach, you can end up with a VC list you are much happier with and that can help you run a thorough VC fundraising process.
p.s. what are your favorite sources to build out a VC list?
What'd you think of this email?
Thank you for stepping Into the Ring
Enjoyed this newsletter? Forward it to a friend - when they sign up, I’ll send them my 127 pitch decks from Tier 1 raises.
Are you a founder who wants to run your best fundraise? I’ve helped 60+ founders raise over $270M - here’s how we can work together.



